Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433773›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

Long-term effects of agronomic practices on winter wheat yield and NUE in dryland regions of USA and China: a long-term meta-analysis.

Muhammad Adil, Fenglin Lv, Liang Cao, Heli Lu, Siqi Lu, Isma Gul, Safdar Bashir, Zhenchuang Wang, Tingting Li, Wanfu Feng

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Muhammad AdilCollege of Geography and Environmental Science/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center On Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Fenglin LvCollege of Geography and Environmental Science/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center On Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Liang CaoCollege of Geography and Environmental Science/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center On Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Heli LuCollege of Geography and Environmental Science/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center On Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China. luheli@vip.henu.edu.cn.
Siqi LuDepartment of Geography, Sustainability, Community, and Urban Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269-4148, USA. siqi.lu@uconn.edu.
Isma GulCollege of Geography and Environmental Science/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center On Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Safdar BashirDepartment of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA.
Zhenchuang WangCollege of Geography and Environmental Science/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center On Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Tingting LiCollege of Geography and Environmental Science/Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center On Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Wanfu FengThe Forest Science Research Institute of Xinyang, Xinyang, 464031, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dryland agriculture is fundamental to global crop production and vital to food security. Conservation tillage is extensively practiced in USA wheat cultivation. Meanwhile, the adoption of conservation tillage by Chinese farmers is limited. This meta-analysis compared the yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) between conservation tillage and conventional tillage (CT) with different types of cropping systems, mulching methods, levels of nitrogen fertilizer (NF), and addition of manure. The meta-analysis presented that conservation tillage at high-NF enhanced the yield and NUE, and reduced the yield and NUE at low-NF, compared to CT. The interaction of conservation tillage with leguminous cover crops (LCC) and manure application increased the yield and NUE at low-NF, compared to CT. Non-leguminous cover crops (NLCC) increased the yield and NUE under high-NF than low-NF. The interaction of conservation tillage with management practices showed that the no-tillage (NT) with leguminous cover crops (LCC) significantly increased wheat yield by 58% and NUE by 47% under low-NF compared to CT. However, increasing the rate of NF did not increase the yield under such interaction. Cropping systems, mulching types, and manure application mainly determined the effects of conservation tillage on wheat yield and NUE. The adverse impact of CT on yield and NUE could be alleviated with the application of LCC and manure under moderate NF. We demonstrate that adding LCC and manure have a generally substitutive relationship with N fertilizer, resulting in a significant increase in wheat yield and NUE at low-NF doses as at high N fertilizer dosages. Therefore, based on the obtained results, moderate NF with LCC and manure application is recommended for growing winter wheat in dryland regions of the USA and China.

Indexed as

Crop ProductionFertilizersNitrogenTriticumChinaCrops, AgriculturalManureSeasonsUnited StatesFertilizersManureNitrogenClimate changeCrop management practicesDryland winter wheat yieldLong-term experimentsNitrogen use efficiencySustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID39433773
PMCPMC11494107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.