ArticleScientific reports2024
Assessment of toxicity changes induced by exposure of human cells to lunar dust simulant.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Mechanisms and protective strategies for astronaut skin injury in deep space environments].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Pooled it
- [Toxicity of lunar dust simulant exposure via the digestive system: Microbiota dysbiosis and multi-organ injury].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The toxicity of lunar dust (LD) to astronauts' health has been confirmed in the Apollo missions and subsequent biological experiments. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the biological toxicity of lunar dust for future human missions to the Moon. In this study, we exposed human lung epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) and peripheral blood B lymphocytes (AHH-1) to varying concentrations (0, 500, 1000, and 1500 μg/ml) of a lunar dust simulant (LDS) called CLDS-i for 24 and 48 h. The results provided the following key findings: (1) LDS induction of cell damage occurred through oxidative stress, with the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in BEAS-2B cells being dependent on the duration of exposure. (2) Necrosis and early apoptosis were observed in BEAS-2B cells and AHH-1 cells, respectively. In addition, both cells showed lysosomal damage. (3) Genes CXCL1, SPP1, CSF2, MMP1, and POSTN are implicated in immune response and cytoskeletal arrangement regulation in BEAS-2B cells. Considering the similarities in composition and properties between CLDS-i and real lunar dust, our findings not only enhance the understanding of LDS toxicity, but also contribute to a better comprehension of the genomic alterations and molecular mechanisms underlying cellular toxicity induced by LD. These insights will contribute to the development of a biotoxicology framework aimed at safeguarding the health of astronauts and, consequently, facilitating future human missions to the Moon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.