ArticleScientific reports2024
A lightweight model design approach for few-shot malicious traffic classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classifying malicious traffic, which can trace the lineage of attackers' malicious families, is fundamental to safeguarding cybersecurity. However, the deep learning approaches currently employed require substantial volumes of data, conflicting with the challenges in acquiring and accurately labeling malicious traffic data. Additionally, edge network devices vulnerable to cyber-attacks often cannot meet the computational demands required to deploy deep learning models. The rapid mutation of malicious activities further underscores the need for models with strong generalization capabilities to adapt to evolving threats. This paper introduces an innovative few-shot malicious traffic classification method that is precise, lightweight, and exhibits enhanced generalization. By refining traditional transfer learning, the source model is segmented into public and private feature extractors for stepwise transfer, enhancing parameter alignment with specific target tasks. Neuron importance is then sorted based on the task of each feature extractor, enabling precise pruning to create an optimal lightweight model. An adversarial network guiding principle is adopted for retraining the public feature extractor parameters, thus strengthening the model's generalization power. This method achieves an accuracy of over 97% on few-shot datasets with no more than 15 samples per class, has fewer than 50 K model parameters, and exhibits superior generalization compared to baseline methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.