ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025
Non Invasive Preimplantation Testing for Aneuploidies in Assisted Reproduction: A SWOT Analysis.
Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended blastocyst culture improves DNA yield in non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy but diagnostic specificity remains limited.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fluid biopsies forMedicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of non-invasive PGT-A offers a new strategy to genetically assess the preimplantation embryo and to enhance IVF results. The extraction of DNA from the embryo culture medium has been sufficiently demonstrated, and the ability to obtain chromosomal information as a result is particularly interesting. As morphological criteria have proven to have a weak correlation with embryo ploidy status, this technique emerges as a promising alternative for embryo selection. It also appears reasonable that avoiding biopsy may enhance further embryo development. However, there are growing concerns regarding several aspects of this technique, such as the origin of this cell free DNA, the degree of representativeness of the whole embryo, the need for extended culture or the absence of standardized protocols. Despite the published data on good prognosis couples are promising, niPGT-A is yet to be considered a substitute for trophectoderm biopsy. The current SWOT analysis aims to summarize both resolved and unresolved issues, as well as limiting aspects of niPGT-A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39433699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.