ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Testing Visual Function by Assessment of the Optomotor Reflex in Glaucoma.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-aversive Animal Restraint Enabling Recording of Optomotor Reflex in Ground Squirrels.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optomotor response/reflex (OMR) is a fast and efficient first-in-line visual screening method, especially for rodents. It has the potential to evaluate both the scotopic and photopic visions of nonrestrained animals through tracking head movement, providing a quantitative estimate of visual functions. In restrained animals, optokinetic response (OKR), compensatory eye movements for visual shifts in the surroundings, is utilized. Both OMR and OKR capitalize on an individual's innate reflex to stabilize images for the purpose of capturing clear vision. The two reflexes have similar reliability when evaluating stimulus luminance, contrast, spatial frequency, and velocity. They have emerged as powerful tools to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological treatments and phenotypes of subjects undergoing study. With OMR and OKR accurately assessing visual acuity (VA) as well as contrast sensitivity (CS), the gold standards for measuring clinical vision, they provide reliable and easily accessible results that further eye and brain research. These methods of sight evaluation have been used in multiple animal models, particularly mice and zebrafish. Through OMR assays, these animal models have been utilized to investigate retinal degenerative diseases, helping researchers differentiate between worsening stages. Alongside tests such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), OMR provides confirmation of visual status, where increased OMR function often correlates with improved visual status. OMR has continued to be used outside of glaucoma in various retinal diseases, such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP), diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration.In this chapter, we will introduce the concept and application of visual stimulus-induced head or eye reflex movement in different animal species and experimental models of eye diseases, such as glaucoma and other neurodegenerative disorders, and in patients with glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39433679What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.