ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2024
Effect of Liquid Load Level and Binder Type on the Tabletability of Mesoporous Silica Based Liquisolids.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquisolids as a platform for the formulation of cannabis tablets.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Solidification Materials and Technology for Solid Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesoporous silica offers an easy way to transform liquids into solids, due to their high loading capacity for liquid or dissolved active ingredients and the resulting enhanced dissolution properties. However, the compression of both unloaded and loaded mesoporous silica bulk material into tablets is challenging, due to poor/non-existing binding capacity. This becomes critical when high drug loads are to be achieved and the fraction of additional excipients in the final tablet formulation needs to be kept at a minimum. Our study aimed to investigate the mechanism of compression and tabletability dependent on the Liquid Load Level of the silica and type of filler/binder in binary tabletting mixtures. To this end, Vivapur® 101, FlowLac® 90, Pearlitol® 200 SD and tricalcium citrate tetrahydrate were selected and mixed with Syloid® XDP 3050 at various Liquid Load Levels. Compaction characteristics were analysed using the StylOne® Classic 105 ML compaction simulator. Additionally, the Overall Liquid Load (OLL) was defined as a new critical quality attribute for liquisolid tablets. The Overall Liquid Load allows straightforward, formulation-relevant comparisons between various fillers/binders, liquid components, and silica types. Results indicate strong binding capacity and high plasticity of the fillers/binders as key components for successful high liquid load silica tablet formulation. A volumetric combination of 30% Vivapur® 101 and 70% 0.75 mL/g loaded Syloid® XDP 3050 proved to be the most effective mixture, achieving an Overall Liquid Load of 36-41% [v/v] and maintaining a tensile strength of 1.5 N/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
39433659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.