ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2024
Effects of Glass Bead Size on Dissolution Profiles in Flow-through Dissolution Systems (USP 4).
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effects of glass bead size in the conical space of flow-through cells on the dissolution profiles were investigated in a USP apparatus 4. Dissolution tests of disintegrating and non-disintegrating tablets in flow-through dissolution systems were performed using semi-high precision glass beads with diameters ranging from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to evaluate the effect of shear stress from the dissolution media flow. The use of smaller glass beads in a larger cell resulted in a faster dissolution of the model formulations under certain test conditions. The effect on the dissolution was highly dependent on the size of the beads in the top layer, including those in contact with the tablets. The absence of a bead-size effect on the dissolution of an orodispersible tablet in a small cell can be explained by the floating fragments during the test. CFD analysis showed that smaller bead diameters led to greater shear stress on the tablet, which was correlated with the dissolution rate. Hence, fluid flow through the narrow gaps between the small beads generated strong local flows, causing shear stress. The size of the glass beads used in flow-through cells affects the dissolution rate of tablets by altering the shear stress on the tablets in certain cases (e.g., direct deposition of the formulation on glass beads, large cells, and very low flow rates). Thus, glass bead size must be considered for a robust dissolution test in a flow-through cell system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39433646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.