Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433639›Full record

ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025

Methodological approaches in 16S sequencing of female reproductive tract in fertility patients: a review.

I M Davidson, E Nikbakht, L M Haupt, K J Ashton, P J Dunn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I M DavidsonHealth Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4672-7922
E NikbakhtHealth Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
L M HauptStem Cell and Neurogenesis Group, Genomics Research Centre, Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 60 Musk Ave., Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-8110
K J AshtonHealth Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6106-3425
P J DunnHealth Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia. pdunn@bond.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-7430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe female genital tract microbiome has become a particular area of interest in improving assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes with the emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. However, NGS assessment of microbiomes currently lacks uniformity and poses significant challenges for accurate and precise bacterial population representation.

objectiveAs multiple NGS platforms and assays have been developed in recent years for microbiome investigation-including the advent of long-read sequencing technologies-this work aimed to identify current trends and practices undertaken in female genital tract microbiome investigations.

resultsAreas like sample collection and transport, DNA extraction, 16S amplification vs. metagenomics, NGS library preparation, and bioinformatic analysis demonstrated a detrimental lack of uniformity. The lack of uniformity present is a significant limitation characterised by gap discrepancies in generation and interpretation of results. Minimal consistency was observed in primer design, DNA extraction techniques, sample transport, and bioinformatic analyses.

conclusionWith third-generation sequencing technology highlighted as a promising tool in microbiota-based research via full-length 16S rRNA sequencing, there is a desperate need for future studies to investigate and optimise methodological approaches of the genital tract microbiome to ensure better uniformity of methods and results interpretation to improve clinical impact.

Indexed as

FertilityGenitalia, FemaleMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomicsReproductive Techniques, AssistedRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAART (assisted reproduction technologies)BioinformaticsIVF (in vitro fertilisation)NGS (next-generation sequencing)

Identifiers

PMID39433639
PMCPMC11805751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.