ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
Liver anatomy for totally laparoscopic segment 7 resection from a caudal magnified view-a 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic resection of hepatic segment 7 is considered particularly difficult. We analyzed anatomic variation of this segment in caudally oriented 3-dimensional (3D) magnified computed tomographic (CT) images obtained prior to liver resection.
methodsAnalysis included 105 patients with preoperative 3D CT evaluation preceding liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancies between April 2021 and April 2024.
resultsFive ramification patterns were evident from a caudal magnified view. Some patients who had multiple segment 7 (S7) portal pedicles and an S7 pedicle branching ventrally posed difficulty in performing segmentectomy for the exact extent of S7. Distance from the point where a perpendicular line from the right rim of the inferior vena cava (IVC) intersected the right posterior portal pedicle to the point of bifurcation of the S6 and 7 pedicles was 34.6 mm (range, 3.9-78.8; mean ± standard deviation, 35.2 ± 14.8 mm). The median angle between the perpendicular line from the right rim of the IVC and the line from the root of the S7 pedicle to the right rim of the IVC was 77° (10-140); the mean ± standard deviation was 75.3° ± 28.1. Differences among ramification patterns also were evident. The angle between the right posterior portal pedicle and the S7 pedicle was 143° (79-215) or 143.3 ± 26.7, and that between S7 and S6 pedicles was 71°(15-123) or 75.5 ± 21.7°, representing relatively little variation.
conclusionsUnderstanding these details of caudal-view anatomy may resolve difficulties and clarify access required for exposing S7 portal pedicles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39433586What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.