Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433504›Full record

ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2024

[Research progress on femoral attachment positioning during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction].

Peng'an Yan, Fan Lu, Yifan Cai, Zhenxing Yan, Yuqiao Wei, Chongxiao Sun, Bin Geng, Yayi Xia

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Research progress of Schöttle's method for femoral tunnel localization in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peng'an YanDepartment of Orthopaedics , the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730030, P. R. China.
Fan LuDepartment of Orthopaedics , the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730030, P. R. China.
Yifan CaiDepartment of Orthopaedics , the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730030, P. R. China.
Zhenxing YanDepartment of Orthopaedics , the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730030, P. R. China.
Yuqiao WeiDepartment of Orthopaedics , the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730030, P. R. China.
Chongxiao SunDepartment of Orthopaedics , the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730030, P. R. China.
Bin GengDepartment of Orthopaedics , the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730030, P. R. China.
Yayi XiaDepartment of Orthopaedics , the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu, 730030, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To review research progress on femoral attachment positioning during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, so as to provide a reference for accurate positioning in clinic. Methods: The literature at home and abroad on femoral attachment positioning during MPFL reconstruction was extensively reviewed and summarized. Results: MPFL is the main ligament that restricts patellar outward migration, so MPFL reconstruction is the main treatment for patellar dislocation, but the accuracy of intraoperative femoral attachment positioning will significantly affect the effectiveness. At present, there are three main methods for femoral attachment positioning in MPFL reconstruction, including imaging positioning, bony landmark positioning, and new technology. Among them, the main imaging positioning method is the "Schöttle point" method, but it has high requirements for fluoroscopic positioning, and can only be accurately positioned under standard lateral fluoroscopy of the femur. The bony landmark positioning method mainly locates the femoral attachment by touching or dissecting the bony landmarks such as adductor tubercles and medial epicondyle of femur, but its disadvantages are that the positioning is not accurate enough, the intraoperative visual field exposure requirements are high, and a large incision is required. In order to avoid the problem that the simple bony landmark positioning method, in recent years, the combination of bony landmarks combined with arthroscopy, three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, and robot-assisted positioning methods have begun to be used in clinical practice. New technology localization methods have shown good results by preparing guides before operation, planning positioning paths in advance, or directly using robots to assist positioning during operation. Conclusion: The accurate positioning of the femoral attachment in MPFL reconstruction is crucial, and the method of accurate and rapid intraoperative determination needs to be further improved and optimized. In the future, it is expected that the combination of computer image recognition correction technology and intraoperative position assistance will solve this problem.

Indexed as

FemurPatellofemoral JointPlastic Surgery ProceduresFluoroscopyHumansLigaments, ArticularPatellar DislocationPatellar Ligamentfemoral attachment positioningmedial patellofemoral ligament reconstructionPatellar dislocationresearch progress

Identifiers

PMID39433504
PMCPMC11522544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.