ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2024
[Research progress in repair and reconstruction of tumor-related bone defects in proximal femur].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Core decompression, allogenic fibula fixation, and pedicled fibula grafting are effective for osteonecrosis of femoral head.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the repair and reconstruction methods for large segmental femoral proximal bone defects caused by tumors, and to explore their clinical application effects, advantages, and disadvantages, and future research directions. Methods: A comprehensive search of Chinese and foreign databases was conducted to select basic and clinical research literature related to the repair and reconstruction of femoral proximal bone defects caused by tumors. The studies were classified and analyzed based on two main strategies: hip-preserving reconstruction and non-hip-preserving reconstruction. Results: In hip-preserving reconstruction, traditional methods such as allograft transplantation and vascularized autograft transplantation are common but have risks of poor bone integration and bone resorption. The clinical application of inactivated tumor segment reimplantation and distraction osteogenesis techniques is limited. In recent years, three-dimensional printing technology has become increasingly mature, with personalized prostheses and precise surgeries becoming development trends. Non-hip-preserving reconstruction primarily includes allograft prosthesis composite and total femoral replacement. The former focuses on improving the survival rate and bone integration efficiency of the allograft, while the latter requires the simultaneous reconstruction of hip and knee joint stability. Conclusion: Significant progress has been made in repairing and reconstructing proximal femoral bone defects caused by tumors, but many challenges remain. The integration of three-dimensional printing technology and digital design offers potential for precise bone defect repair. Future efforts should focus on new concepts, technologies, and materials through multidisciplinary approaches to provide personalized and precise solutions, thereby improving patient quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.