Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433503›Full record

ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2024

[Research progress in repair and reconstruction of tumor-related bone defects in proximal femur].

Linyun Tan, Yitian Wang, Xin Hu, Xuanhong He, Guifeng Du, Hao Wang, Xiaodi Tang, Minghao Sun, Chongqi Tu, Li Min

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linyun TanDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Yitian WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Xin HuDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Xuanhong HeDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Guifeng DuDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Hao WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Xiaodi TangDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Minghao SunDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Chongqi TuDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Li MinDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To review the repair and reconstruction methods for large segmental femoral proximal bone defects caused by tumors, and to explore their clinical application effects, advantages, and disadvantages, and future research directions. Methods: A comprehensive search of Chinese and foreign databases was conducted to select basic and clinical research literature related to the repair and reconstruction of femoral proximal bone defects caused by tumors. The studies were classified and analyzed based on two main strategies: hip-preserving reconstruction and non-hip-preserving reconstruction. Results: In hip-preserving reconstruction, traditional methods such as allograft transplantation and vascularized autograft transplantation are common but have risks of poor bone integration and bone resorption. The clinical application of inactivated tumor segment reimplantation and distraction osteogenesis techniques is limited. In recent years, three-dimensional printing technology has become increasingly mature, with personalized prostheses and precise surgeries becoming development trends. Non-hip-preserving reconstruction primarily includes allograft prosthesis composite and total femoral replacement. The former focuses on improving the survival rate and bone integration efficiency of the allograft, while the latter requires the simultaneous reconstruction of hip and knee joint stability. Conclusion: Significant progress has been made in repairing and reconstructing proximal femoral bone defects caused by tumors, but many challenges remain. The integration of three-dimensional printing technology and digital design offers potential for precise bone defect repair. Future efforts should focus on new concepts, technologies, and materials through multidisciplinary approaches to provide personalized and precise solutions, thereby improving patient quality of life.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationFemurPlastic Surgery ProceduresAllograftsBone NeoplasmsFemoral NeoplasmsHumansOsteogenesis, DistractionPrinting, Three-DimensionalTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, Homologouship-preserving reconstructionProximal femurtumor-related bone defect

Identifiers

PMID39433503
PMCPMC11522535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.