Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433483›Full record

ArticleJournal of chest surgery2025

Recommendation for Clinical T Staging in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Volumetric Measurement: A Retrospective Study from Turkey.

Muhammet Sayan, Aykut Kankoc, Muhammet Tarik Aslan, Irmak Akarsu, İsmail Cuneyt Kurul, Ali Celik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammet SayanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-9031
Aykut KankocDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-6115
Muhammet Tarik AslanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-1131
Irmak AkarsuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5427-9770
İsmail Cuneyt KurulDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-010X
Ali CelikDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-6492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Currently, clinical T staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is based on the largest radiological diameter observed on computed tomography (CT). Under this system, tumors with varying shapes-such as spherical, amorphous, or spiculated tumors- can be assigned the same T stage even with different volumes. We aimed to propose a 3-dimensional (3D) volumetric staging system for NSCLC as an alternative to diameter- based T staging and to conduct comparative survival analyses between these methods. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent surgery for pT1-4N0M0 primary NSCLC between January 2018 and May 2022. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data from patient CT scans were uploaded to 3D Slicer software for volumetric tumor measurement. Using the paired samples t-test or the Wilcoxon test, we compared the expected tumor volumes, calculated by tumor diameter, with the actual volumes measured by 3D Slicer. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to determine the cut-off value for tumor volume. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to assess overall survival, while the log-rank method was applied to compare survival differences between groups. The significance of changes in T stage was evaluated using the marginal homogeneity test. Results: The study included 136 patients. Significant differences were observed between expected and actual tumor volumes (p=0.01), and associated changes in T stage were also significant (p=0.04). The survival analysis performed using tumor volume (p=0.009) yielded superior results compared to that based on diameter (p=0.04) in paients with early tumor stage. Conclusion: T-factor staging based on tumor volume could represent an alternative staging method for NSCLC.

Indexed as

3D-Slicer8th edition TNMNon-small-cell lung carcinomaTumor volume

Identifiers

PMID39433483
PMCPMC11884980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.