ArticleBMJ open2024
Association between physical activity and diabetes control: multiple cross-sectional studies and a prospective study in a population-based, Swiss cohort.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhysical activity (PA) is recommended in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to improve their glycaemic control. We aimed to assess PA levels among participants with controlled and uncontrolled T2DM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThree cross-sectional analyses of a prospective cohort conducted in Lausanne, Switzerland. PA levels (sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous) were either self-reported via questionnaire (first and second survey) or objectively assessed using accelerometry (second and third survey). T2DM control was defined as glycaemia <7.0 mmol/L or glycated haemoglobin <6.5% (48 mmol/mol).
resultsData from 195 (30.3% women), 199 (30.1% women) and 151 (44.4% women) participants with T2DM were analysed in the first (2009-2012), second (2014-2017) and third (2018-2021) surveys. Approximately half of the participants did not have controlled glycaemia. Using subjective data, over 90% (first survey) and 75% (second survey) of participants reported moderate and vigorous PA >150 min/week. After multivariable adjustment, no differences were found regarding all types of self-reported PA levels between controlled and uncontrolled participants. Objective assessment of PA led to considerable differences according to the software used: 90% and 20% of participants with moderate and vigorous PA >150 min/week, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, no differences were found for all PA levels between controlled and uncontrolled participants, irrespective of the analytical procedure used. Using glycated haemoglobin, almost two-thirds of participants were considered as uncontrolled, and no differences were found for objectively assessed PA between controlled and uncontrolled participants.
conclusionsNo differences in PA levels were found between participants with controlled and uncontrolled T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.