ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2024
Numerical Investigation of the Blast-Induced Injuries Using an Open-Source Detailed Human Model.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blasts are a threat both in military and civil contexts due not only to explosive devices but also to gas leakages or other accidents. Numerical models could aid to plan response strategies in the short and long term. Nevertheless, due to modeling complexities, a standardized computational framework has not been established yet. In this challenging context, the present study assesses the prediction of blast-induced traumas by using the total human model for safety (THUMS) human model, which has never been attempted before to the authors knowledge. The pedestrian model is publicly available, hence the demonstration of its suitability to predict blast injuries could benefit the establishment of a common modeling framework. Therefore, the THUMS human model was exposed to different blast scenarios both in free field and partially confined spaces and the response of vital organs was investigated. Trauma patterns to internal organs of the THUMS were consistent with available experimental data and injury thresholds. In conclusion, THUMS open-source human model demonstrated its validity to reproduce primary blast-related injuries, addressing the development of standardization of numerical simulations of human response to explosions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.