ArticleBMJ global health2024
Defining blood deserts and access to blood products for 660 million people: a geospatial analysis of eight states in Northern India.
Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timely geographic access to blood banking facilities: A pan-India modelling study.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Using unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) to improve access to blood in low- and middle-income countries: Current challenges and opportunities.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
- Article
- Blood Donation Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Amid Instability: A Biphasic Cross-Sectional Study in West Bank, Palestine (2022 vs 2025).SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBlood transfusion is crucial, but low-income and middle-income countries like India face a severe shortage of banked blood. This study focuses on the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states in India, where healthcare is limited, and health outcomes are poor. Our objective was to assess the blood banking infrastructure and access to blood products in these states.
methodsWe used e-Rakht Khosh, an online platform for blood availability data. We collected data on blood bank locations and stocks from 18 January to 9 February 2022 and used ArcGIS to determine the population residing within 30-60-90 min of a blood bank. Availability ratios were calculated by dividing available blood products by population in these catchment areas. Descriptive analysis characterised availability, and statistical tests evaluated differences across states and over the 4-week period.
results806 of 824 blood banks reported data on blood stocks. Our analysis showed that 25.72% of the EAG states' population live within 30 min of a blood bank, while 61.45% and 92.46% live within 60 and 90 min, respectively.
conclusionBlood availability rates were low in the EAG states, with only 0.6 units per 1000 people. Additionally, only 61% of the population had access to blood-equipped facilities within an hour. These rates fell below the standards of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (15 units per 1000 population) and the WHO (10 donations per 1000 population). The study highlights the challenges in meeting demand for blood in emergencies due to inadequate blood banking infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.