ArticleAsian spine journal2024
A magnetic resonance imaging-based morphometric analysis of bilateral L1-L5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion corridor: feasibility of safe surgical approach and influencing factors.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphometric Variations in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Corridors in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: A Comparative Study of the Apex Direction.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Article
- Observational Comparative Study for Surgical Outcomes of One- or Two-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgery Between Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: To investigate the size and local anatomy of the right and the left-sided oblique corridors between L1-L5 levels and identify the potential impact of increasing age and sex on corridor size. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) was introduced by Silvestre and his colleagues as a solution to the approach-related complications associated with anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Limited data were available describing the local anatomy and morphology of this approach.
methodsImaging data of 300 patients (150 males and 150 females) who underwent 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the lumbar spine at Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, India between January 2023 and January 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort was stratified into six age groups (21-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, and >70 years) with 25 patients in each age group for both sexes. T2 weighted axial MRI images were analyzed from the L1-L5 level at the mid-disc level to calculate the corridor size. The local anatomical differences were recorded.
resultsAt L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 levels, the mean corridor sizes in males were 17.48, 15.50, 13.41, and 9.32 mm on the left side, and 11.48, 7.12, 4.34, and 1.64 mm on the right side, respectively. The corresponding mean corridor sizes in females were 10.34, 12.94, 12.64, and 7.22 mm on the left side and 2.66, 3.52, 3.69, and 1.64 mm on the right side, respectively. For both sides, the corridor size was significantly affected by sex, increased with age, and decreased at the lower lumbar disc levels.
conclusionsA left-sided OLIF approach is more feasible for both sexes. The right-sided approach is less likely to be performed effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.