Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433334›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025

Comprehensive Segmentation of Gray Matter Structures on T1-Weighted Brain MRI: A Comparative Study of Convolutional Neural Network, Convolutional Neural Network Hybrid-Transformer or -Mamba Architectures.

Yujia Wei, Jaidip Manikrao Jagtap, Yashbir Singh, Bardia Khosravi, Jason Cai, Jeffrey L Gunter, Bradley J Erickson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yujia WeiFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9342-0498
Jaidip Manikrao JagtapFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1839-862X
Yashbir SinghFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Bardia KhosraviFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jason CaiFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9190-0252
Jeffrey L GunterFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-7813-9078
Bradley J EricksonFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota bje@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7926-6095

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI Duygu Tosun-Turgut · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRecent advances in deep learning have shown promising results in medical image analysis and segmentation. However, most brain MRI segmentation models are limited by the size of their data sets and/or the number of structures they can identify. This study evaluates the performance of 6 advanced deep learning models in segmenting 122 brain structures from T1-weighted MRI scans, aiming to identify the most effective model for clinical and research applications. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 1510 T1-weighted MRIs were used to compare 6 deep learning models for the segmentation of 122 distinct gray matter structures: nnU-Net, SegResNet, SwinUNETR, UNETR, U-Mamba_BOT, and U-Mamba_ Enc. Each model was rigorously tested for accuracy by using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Additionally, the volume of each structure was calculated and compared between normal controls (NCs) and patients with Alzheimer disease (AD).

resultsU-Mamba_Bot achieved the highest performance with a median DSC of 0.9112 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.8957, 0.9250). nnU-Net achieved a median DSC of 0.9027 [IQR: 0.8847, 0.9205], and had the highest HD95 of 1.392 [IQR: 1.174, 2.029]. The value of each HD95 (<3 mm) indicates its superior capability in capturing detailed brain structures accurately. Following segmentation, volume calculations were performed, and the resultant volumes of NCs and patients with AD were compared. The volume changes observed in 13 brain substructures were all consistent with those reported in existing literature, reinforcing the reliability of the segmentation outputs.

conclusionsThis study underscores the efficacy of U-Mamba_Bot as a robust tool for detailed brain structure segmentation in T1-weighted MRI scans. The congruence of our volumetric analysis with the literature further validates the potential of advanced deep learning models to enhance the understanding of neurodegenerative diseases such as AD. Future research should consider larger data sets to validate these findings further and explore the applicability of these models in other neurologic conditions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainDeep LearningGray MatterImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAgedConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39433334
PMCPMC11979858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.