Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433324›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2024

Removal of errant coils using the Tigertriever-13.

Shah Islam, Ze'ev Itzakzonhayosh, Emily Chung, Andrew Falzon, Hugo Andrade, Pascal Mosimann

Abstract readCase ReportsVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shah IslamJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada s.islam@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9013-3717
Ze'ev ItzakzonhayoshJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emily ChungJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew FalzonJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-6635
Hugo AndradeDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pascal MosimannJoint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coil migration poses a significant intraprocedural risk during coil embolization in interventional neuroradiology procedures. In this technical video we describe the technique of removal of errand coils using the low profile Tigertriever-13 device.1 Traditional methods of errant coil retrieval rely on the use of stent retrievers;2 however, these devices are usually too large to fit through smaller inner diameter 0.013-0.0165 inch coiling catheters, thus requiring upsizing materials in emergency situations.3 We demonstrate the technique of coil retrieval using this low-profile device ex-vivo in silicone flow models, then its application in vivo as a 'bail-out' technique during acute embolization of a ruptured peri-callosal aneurysm which required retrieval of errant coils (video 1). neurintsurg;16/12/1212/V1F1V1Video 1Errant coil retrieval using the Tigertriever device.

Indexed as

Device RemovalEmbolization, TherapeuticIntracranial AneurysmAneurysm, RupturedForeign-Body MigrationHumansAneurysmCoilDeviceInterventionStent

Identifiers

PMID39433324
PMCPMC12163978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.