Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024

Case report: Novel approach to distal radius non-union treatment with free fibula flap reconstruction.

Maria Albuquerque, Luís Mata Ribeiro, Miguel Botton

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria AlbuquerqueServiço de Cirurgia Plástica e Reconstrutiva do Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Portugal.
Luís Mata RibeiroServiço de Cirurgia Plástica e Reconstrutiva do Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Portugal. Electronic address: luis.ribeiro2@ulssjose.min-saude.pt.
Miguel BottonUnidade de Punho e Mão, CUF Descobertas, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDistal radius fractures are common among adults. Despite being a rare complication, occurring in only 0.2 % of the cases, non-union poses significant treatment challenges. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In this article, we report the case of a 43-year-old male with a history of distal radius fracture resulting from a motorcycle accident. His initial treatment consisted of external fixation followed by a distraction plate and internal fixation with volar plate and screws. Due to plate breakage, he underwent refixation with a volar plate and autologous bone graft six months after the accident. However, five months after surgery, CT-scans showed a radius non-union. This led to a multidisciplinary approach involving orthopaedic and plastic surgery teams, where the patient underwent distal radius reconstruction using a free fibula flap. Postoperative recovery led to favourable outcomes with evidence of bony consolidation at six-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Conventional techniques for distal radius non-union treatment may fall short in achieving bony continuity in a non-suitable soft tissue environment. Free vascularised fibular flap has emerged as a primary option for long bone reconstruction, offering advantages such as anatomical compatibility and immediate structural support.

conclusionThis case highlights the efficacy of free fibular flap in addressing complex distal radius non-unions, providing an effective solution when simpler techniques have failed.

Indexed as

Case reportFree fibula flapRadius non-unionUpper limb bone defect

Identifiers

PMID39433016
PMCPMC11535361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.