ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
PONYTA: prioritization of phenotype-related genes from mouse KO events using PU learning on a biological network.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationTranscriptome data from gene knock-out (KO) experiments in mice provide crucial insights into the intricate interactions between genotype and phenotype. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis and network propagation (NP) are well-established methods for analysing transcriptome data. To determine genes related to phenotype changes from a KO experiment, we need to choose a cutoff value for the corresponding criterion based on the specific method. Using a rigorous cutoff value for DEG analysis and NP is likely to select mostly positive genes related to the phenotype, but many will be rejected as false negatives. On the other hand, using a loose cutoff value for either method is prone to include a number of genes that are not phenotype-related, which are false positives. Thus, the research problem at hand is how to deal with the trade-off between false negatives and false positives.
resultsWe propose a novel framework called PONYTA for gene prioritization via positive-unlabeled (PU) learning on biological networks. Beginning with the selection of true phenotype-related genes using a rigorous cutoff value for DEG analysis and NP, we address the issue of handling false negatives by rescuing them through PU learning. Evaluations on transcriptome data from multiple studies show that our approach has superior gene prioritization ability compared to benchmark models. Therefore, PONYTA effectively prioritizes genes related to phenotypes derived from gene KO events and guides in vitro and in vivo gene KO experiments for increased efficiency. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of PONYTA is available at https://github.com/Jun-Hyeong-Kim/PONYTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.