Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39432550›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Auto encoder-based defense mechanism against popular adversarial attacks in deep learning.

Syeda Nazia Ashraf, Raheel Siddiqi, Humera Farooq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Syeda Nazia AshrafDepartment of Computer Science, Bahria University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Raheel SiddiqiDepartment of Computer Science, Bahria University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9469-0844
Humera FarooqDepartment of Computer Science, Bahria University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based models are prone to adversarial attacks, which present a significant hurdle to their reliability and robustness. The vulnerability of CNN-based models may be exploited by attackers to launch cyber-attacks. An attacker typically adds small, carefully crafted perturbations to original medical images. When a CNN-based model receives the perturbed medical image as input, it misclassifies the image, even though the added perturbation is often imperceptible to the human eye. The emergence of such attacks has raised security concerns regarding the implementation of deep learning-based medical image classification systems within clinical environments. To address this issue, a reliable defense mechanism is required to detect adversarial attacks on medical images. This study will focus on the robust detection of pneumonia in chest X-ray images through CNN-based models. Various adversarial attacks and defense strategies will be evaluated and analyzed in the context of CNN-based pneumonia detection. From earlier studies, it has been observed that a single defense mechanism is usually not effective against more than one type of adversarial attack. Therefore, this study will propose a defense mechanism that is effective against multiple attack types. A reliable defense framework for pneumonia detection models will ensure secure clinical deployment, facilitating radiologists and doctors in their diagnosis and treatment planning. It can also save time and money by automating routine tasks. The proposed defense mechanism includes a convolutional autoencoder to denoise perturbed Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial images, two state- of-the-art attacks carried out at five magnitudes, i.e., ε (epsilon) values. Two pre-trained models, VGG19 and VGG16, and our hybrid model of MobileNetV2 and DenseNet169, called Stack Model, have been used to compare their results. This study shows that the proposed defense mechanism outperforms state-of-the-art studies. The PGD attack using the VGG16 model shows a better attack success rate by reducing overall accuracy by up to 67%. The autoencoder improves accuracy by up to 16% against PGD attacks in both the VGG16 and VGG19 models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsComputer SecurityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPneumonia

Identifiers

PMID39432550
PMCPMC11493261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.