Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39432547›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Examination of public perceptions of microbes and microbiomes in the United States reveals insights for science communication.

Katherine Kokkinias, Katherine Pruneski, Kelly Wrighton, Nicole Kelp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine KokkiniasDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1422-6372
Katherine PruneskiDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0007-1373-8927
Kelly WrightonDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Nicole KelpDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8462-5689

Funding

Microbial ecology of the inflamed intestineR01AI143288 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AHMER, BRIAN M, WRIGHTON, KELLY C · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
CSU Infectious Disease Research and Response Training ProgramT32AI162691 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEAN, GREGG A · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143288NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI162691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within a changing research and media landscape, misconceptions and misinformation about microorganisms and microbiomes can arise, necessitating improvements in science communication practices through insights in public perceptions of the microbial world. Yet, little is known about public perceptions of microorganisms and microbiomes, making it difficult to develop tailored messaging. Here we perform an inductive thematic analysis with interviews and surveys from thirty adults across the United States to identify key factors to enhance microbial science communication efforts. Together, our results underscore the importance of 1) recognizing the existing and desired future knowledge of an audience, 2) aligning with broader socio-scientific issues that resonate with people in relevant channels using social networks, 3) fostering collaboration between microbiologists, social scientists, and communicators to improve messaging, and 4) appealing to people's values and emotions to establish meaningful connections. This study concludes that non-microbial interests, such as an interest in health and wellness, may lead to acquisition of microbial knowledge and that people want scientists to share microbial messages preferably on platforms like social media. Additionally, we identified confusion about microbial terms and a desire to understand human-centric benefits of microorganisms and microbiomes. We suggest that microbiologists partner with science communicators to develop microbial messaging, capitalizing on connections to non-microbial interests and appealing to people's microbial worldview.

Indexed as

CommunicationMicrobiotaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPublic OpinionSocial MediaSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39432547
PMCPMC11493282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.