ArticlePloS one2024
3D CNN for neuropsychiatry: Predicting Autism with interpretable Deep Learning applied to minimally preprocessed structural MRI data.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metaheuristic hyperparameter optimization of deep neural networks for demographic-aware autism spectrum disorder classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The role of machine learning in autism spectrum disorder assessment and management.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Leveraging AI-Driven Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Early Detection and Social Function Prediction in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning interpretability in neuroimaging: A comprehensive survey and methodological recommendations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive modeling approaches are enabling progress toward robust and reproducible brain-based markers of neuropsychiatric conditions by leveraging the power of multivariate analyses of large datasets. While deep learning (DL) offers another promising avenue to further advance progress, there are challenges related to implementation in 3D (best for MRI) and interpretability. Here, we address these challenges and describe an interpretable predictive pipeline for inferring Autism diagnosis using 3D DL applied to minimally processed structural MRI scans. We trained 3D DL models to predict Autism diagnosis using the openly available ABIDE I and II datasets (n = 1329, split into training, validation, and test sets). Importantly, we did not perform transformation to template space, to reduce bias and maximize sensitivity to structural alterations associated with Autism. Our models attained predictive accuracies equivalent to those of previous machine learning (ML) studies, while side-stepping the time- and resource-demanding requirement to first normalize data to a template. Our interpretation step, which identified brain regions that contributed most to accurate inference, revealed regional Autism-related alterations that were highly consistent with the literature, encompassing a left-lateralized network of regions supporting language processing. We have openly shared our code and models to enable further progress towards remaining challenges, such as the clinical heterogeneity of Autism and site effects, and to enable the extension of our method to other neuropsychiatric conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.