Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39432372›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2024

German general practitioners' experiences of managing post-COVID-19 syndrome: A qualitative interview study.

Josefine Schulze, Lennart Lind, Alina Rojas Albert, Laura Lüdtke, Jens Hensen, Corinna Bergelt, Martin Härter, Nadine Janis Pohontsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychometric validation of a cognition and social participation bolt-on for the EQ-5D-5L in SARS-CoV-2 infected German healthcare workers.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Josefine SchulzeDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5727-9343
Lennart LindDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alina Rojas AlbertDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Laura LüdtkeDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jens HensenInstitute of Medical Psychology, Greifswald University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-6070-0634
Corinna BergeltInstitute of Medical Psychology, Greifswald University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1413-1872
Martin HärterDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7443-9890
Nadine Janis PohontschDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-4087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of the long-term sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, known as post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), continues to challenge the medical community, largely owing to a significant gap in the understanding of its aetiology, diagnosis and effective treatment.

aimTo examine general practitioners' (GPs) experiences of caring for patients with PCS and to identify unmet care needs and opportunities for improvement. DESIGN AND

settingThis study follows a qualitative design, using in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews with GPs (

methodInterviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsGPs reported that they were often the first point of contact for patients with persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, with symptoms typically resolving within weeks. While ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 is perceived to be more common, the relevance of PCS to GP practices is considerable given its severe impact on patients' functioning, social participation and the substantial time required for patient care. GPs coordinate diagnosis and treatment but face challenges because of the unclear definition of PCS and difficulties in attributing symptoms, resulting in a cautious approach to ICD-10 coding. Interviewees highlight lengthy diagnostic pathways and barriers to accessing specialist care.

conclusionThe findings confirm the high functional limitations and psychosocial burden of PCS on patients, and the central role of GPs in their care. The study suggests a need for further research and health policy measures to support GPs in navigating diagnostic uncertainty, interprofessional communication and the limited evidence on effective treatments.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PractitionersInterviews as TopicPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedCOVID-19pandemicspost-acute COVID-19 syndromePrimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID39432372
PMCPMC11494714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.