ArticleFamilies, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare2024
Strengthening community capacity to address trauma through a Community Ambassador Network.
Article in Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCommunity ambassadors (CAs) are advocates that build trust with communities on behalf of service systems and facilitate access to resources. Whether and how CAs can support community engagement within a large initiative to build capacity to address the impact of trauma is unclear. This study explores how a Community Ambassador Network supported community engagement with "Innovations 2 Initiative" (INN 2), a 5-year initiative that addressed trauma across nine communities in Los Angeles County.
methodCAs were recruited from nine community-based partnerships to participate in a focus group, which explored their roles and experiences with INN 2 and their impact on community engagement. Data were collected in 2022 and were analyzed using a pragmatic two-phase strategy for efficient qualitative data analysis. Twenty-six CAs participated in six focus groups. Participants mostly spoke English (82%), identified as Latinx (50%) or Black (23%) and as cisgender female (48%); average age was 40 years.
resultsCAs implemented workshops and provided health education to the community. They reported being the community's first point of contact with INN 2 and believed they improved credibility of the human service sector. While CAs felt supported by the Department of Mental Health, some wanted more trust from their supervisors. DISCUSSION: CAs described various ways that they engaged historically excluded communities in INN activities and the organizational supports that facilitated this work. Training in trauma informed principles and support from their supervisors were regarded essential to this work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.