Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39432230›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025

A Review on Bacteriocin Extraction Techniques from Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Sharleen Livina Isaac, Amalia Mohd Hashim, Fadzlie Wong Faizal Wong, Muhamad Afiq Mohamed Akbar, Wan Nur Ismah Wan Ahmad Kamil

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharleen Livina IsaacDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Amalia Mohd HashimDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Fadzlie Wong Faizal WongDepartment of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Muhamad Afiq Mohamed AkbarDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Wan Nur Ismah Wan Ahmad KamilDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. wn_ismah@upm.edu.my.

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia, through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2021/STG01/UPM/02/7) 19764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely known for the production of secondary metabolites such as organic acids and other bioactive compounds such as bacteriocins. Finding a broad application in food and healthcare, bacteriocins have received increased attention due to their inherent antimicrobial properties. However, the extraction of bacteriocins is often plagued with low yields due to the complexity of the extraction processes and the diversity of bacteriocins themselves. Here, we review the current knowledge related to bacteriocin extraction on the different extraction techniques for isolating bacteriocins from LAB. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique will also be critically appraised, taking into account factors such as extraction efficiency, scalability and cost-effectiveness. This review aims to guide researchers and professionals in selecting the most suitable approach for bacteriocin extraction from LAB by illuminating the respective advantages and limitations of various extraction techniques.

Indexed as

BacteriocinsLactobacillalesBacteriocinsAntimicrobialBacteriocinExtractionGenome miningLactic acid bacteriaPrecipitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.