Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39432200›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2026

Using Item Response Theory to Develop a Shortened Version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children.

Jiarui Pan, Xuliang Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiarui PanSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China.
Xuliang GaoSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China. gaoxl9817@foxmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PSWQ-C is a widely used international scale to measure worry traits in children and adolescents. It has been translated into several versions for use in different countries. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric characteristics of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children (PSWQ-C) particularly three reverse-scored items, and to develop a shorter version of the PSWQ-C based on Item Response Theory (IRT) methods. 903 children and adolescents of different ages from China participated in the study. This study used the Graded Response Model (GRM) to fit the data and examined the IRT parameters of each item, Item Characteristic Curve, Item Information Functions, and Differential Item Functioning. Eight items with undesirable functioning were removed, while six items with good functioning were retained, resulting in a simplified version of the PSWQ-C. The abbreviated version of the PSWQ-C was subsequently validated for its reliability and validity. The results confirmed that the abbreviated scale is reliable and effective, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.84, indicating good reliability. Regarding validity, the abbreviated version of the PSWQ-C demonstrated significant correlations with IUS-12 and MASC, both exceeding 0.60, which closely resembles the correlation of the original PSWQ-C with these two scales. Furthermore, the correlation between the two versions was 0.96, indicating that the abbreviated PSWQ-C can effectively replace the original version and has a broader range of applications.

Indexed as

AnxietyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsAdolescentChildChinaFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildrenItem response theoryShort formThe penn state worry questionnaire

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.