ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Potential ameliorative effect of Dapagliflozin on systemic inflammation-induced cardiovascular injury via endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy pathway.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDapagliflozin (DPG) is a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor and is used in the treatment of diabetes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DPG on cardiotoxicity caused by systemic inflammation via endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and autophagy. METHODS AND
resultsFour groups of thirty-two Wistar Albino rats were created: Control (1 ml oral physiological saline for five days and intraperitoneal saline on the 5th day), LPS (1 ml oral physiological saline for five days and intraperitoneal 5 mg/kg of LPS on the 5th day), LPS + DPG (10 mg/kg of DPG orally for five days and 5 mg/kg of LPS intraperitoneally on the 5th day), and DPG (10 mg/kg of DPG orally for five days and 5 mg/kg of SF intraperitoneally on the 5th day). Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed on heart and aorta tissues. ER stress and autophagy gene markers in heart tissues were evaluated by RT-qPCR. Oxidative stress in heart tissues and serum cardiac enzymes were analyzed by spectrophotometric method. The heart and aortic tissues of the LPS group showed increased expressions of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) and Caspase-3 (Cas-3), along with mild hyperemia, slight inflammatory cell infiltrations, and myocardial cell damage. The heart tissues also showed genetically increased expressions of include binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP/ GRP78), protein kinase RNA-like ER Kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE-1), activating transcription factors 4 (ATF-4), activating transcription factors 4 (ATF6), C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), and BECLIN 1. Furthermore, Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in blood tissue significantly increased, according to biochemical analysis. With DPG therapy, all of these findings were reversed.
conclusionIn conclusion, DPG protects against the cardiotoxic effect of systemic inflammation with its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties by regulating ER stress and autophagy pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39432138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.