Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39432126›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025

Improvements in visual function early after cataract surgery in eyes implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses.

Ken Hayashi, Motoaki Yoshida, Shin-Ichi Manabe, Akira Hirata

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ken HayashiHayashi Eye Hospital, 4-23-35 Hakataekimae, Hakata-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-0011, Japan. hayashi-ken@hayashi.or.jp.
Motoaki YoshidaHayashi Eye Hospital, 4-23-35 Hakataekimae, Hakata-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-0011, Japan.
Shin-Ichi ManabeHayashi Eye Hospital, 4-23-35 Hakataekimae, Hakata-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-0011, Japan.
Akira HirataHayashi Eye Hospital, 4-23-35 Hakataekimae, Hakata-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-0011, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the improvements in all-distance visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity early after cataract surgery among eyes implanted with multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). STUDY

designNonrandomized comparative study.

methodsForty-two eyes with a trifocal IOL (Alcon, PanOptix

resultsMean uncorrected as well as corrected VA improved significantly between 1 day and 3 months postoperatively at almost all distances in the trifocal and combined bifocal + EDF groups (P ≤ 0.018), and at the intermediate distance of 1.0 m and far distances in the monofocal group (P ≤ 0.031). Mean improvements in near uncorrected VA at 0.3 m, intermediate VA at 0.5 m, and far VA at 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 m were significantly greater in the multifocal groups than in the monofocal group (P ≤ 0.032). Improvements in photopic and mesopic contrast VA at most contrasts were significantly better in the multifocal groups (P ≤ 0.021).

conclusionMean uncorrected or corrected VA at almost all distances and contrast sensitivity at most contrasts improved significantly early after surgery in eyes implanted with multifocal IOLs, and the improvements in VA at most distances and in contrast sensitivity were better with multifocal IOLs than with monofocal IOLs.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionContrast SensitivityLenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularMultifocal Intraocular LensesPhacoemulsificationPseudophakiaVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodAll-distance visual acuityCataract surgeryEarly postoperative periodMonofocal intraocular lensMultifocal intraocular lens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.