SynthesisPsychopharmacology2024
Exploring the efficacy of cholinergic agents for the treatment of psychostimulant use disorder: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evidence-based consensus guidelines for the pharmacological management of substance dependence: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleNo drugs are currently validated to treat psychostimulant use disorder (PUD). Pathophysiological studies consistently highlight the contribution of cholinergic mechanisms in psychostimulant use, including the vulnerability to PUD, paving the way for potential therapeutic strategies.
objectivesThe aim of this systematic review is to describe and discuss the efficacy of cholinergic agents in drug trials for patients with PUD.
methodsA systematic review was conducted on April 4, 2024 in MedLine, Embase and Cochrane Library databases on controlled clinical drug trial of cholinergic agents in humans with PUD, psychostimulant abuse or dependence and psychostimulant use in recent year.
resultsTwenty-eight articles were included, twenty-one on cocaine and seven on amphetamines. Cholinergic agents used in these studies were biperiden (a muscarinic antagonist), mecamylamine (a nicotinic antagonist), nicotinic agonists, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI), or citicoline. Two types of trials were identified. There were seventeen randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating cholinergic agents on psychostimulant use reduction in outpatients seeking treatment. Additionally, we retrieved eleven short-term «proof-of-concept» laboratory trials mainly with supervised psychostimulant administration and/or triggered craving challenges. Outpatient trials were heterogeneous and for most, inconclusive. Only two studies on galantamine (AChEI) and citicoline, reported a significant reduction of cocaine consumption. «Proof-of-concept» laboratory trials showed no evidence of efficacy on the selected outcomes, notably on craving.
conclusionsThis review does not support the current prescription of cholinergic agents to treat PUD. Replication clinical trials notably on galantamine or other AChEI, and proof-of-concept trials on comedown symptoms will be necessary to identify a potential therapeutic indication for cholinergic agents in PUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39432105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.