ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Comparative analysis of hypofractionated short-course versus standard radiation therapy in elderly patients with glioblastoma: analysis of nationwide database.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHypofractionated short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) is an alternative treatment option for elderly or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) post-surgery. This study compares survival outcomes and treatment costs between patients receiving SCRT and those undergoing standard long-course radiation therapy (LCRT).
methodsThis retrospective study utilized health insurance claims and national cancer registry data from Korea to compare overall survival (OS) and treatment costs between patients receiving SCRT and LCRT across all ages and sub-group analysis within the subgroup of cases aged 65 and older from 2016 onwards, a period when intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was widely adopted.
resultsA total of 1,598 patients were included. Median OS since the first day of radiation therapy was 10.4 months (95% CI [9.6; 12.8]) for SCRT (n = 197) versus 16.2 months (95% CI [15.5; 16.9]) for LCRT (n = 1401) respectively. Subgroup analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (S-IPTW) showed indicating non-inferiority in elderly patients in median OS for elderly patients (≥ 65) with 10.6 months (95% CI [8.9; 14.0]) for SCRT (n = 147) versus 13.2 months (95% CI [8.9; 14.0]) for LCRT (n = 541). The median treatment cost of SCRT is about 6,000 USD lower, 25% less than LCRT. Compliance with the standard TMZ regimen post-radiation improved OS across all age groups.
conclusionConsidering comparable OS and shorter treatment duration, SCRT offers a viable, cost-effective option for elderly GBM patients. Adhering to standard TMZ also contributes to OS improvement. Further research reflecting key prognostic factors is essential to refining the role of SCRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39432028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.