Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431854›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024

Reflection function, reflectance, and area function measurements in ears of children and adults.

Douglas H Keefe, Denis F Fitzpatrick, Heather L Porter, Su Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Shape and sound analyses of the human ear-canal geometrya).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Douglas H KeefeBoys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7690-096X
Denis F FitzpatrickBoys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
Heather L PorterBoys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
Su ChenCollege of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984375 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198, USA.

Funding

The Impact of Mild Hearing Loss on Auditory Perception in Complex EnvironmentsP20GM109023 · NIGMS · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI CHATTERJEE, MONITA · 2014 to 2023
$23.4M
CAUSALITY CONSTRAINTS ON EAR-CANAL TESTS OF ACOUSTIC REFLECTION FUNCTION AND REFLECTANCER21DC018637 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI KEEFE, DOUGLAS H · 2021 to 2022
$426k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018637NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main experiment concerned time-domain measurements of the acoustical reflection function (RF) of the human ear in adults and children (aged 5 to 8 years) using a probe inserted into the ear canal. This RF was used to calculate the area function of the ear canal versus distance along its centerline. Acoustical reflectance was calculated in the frequency domain from the RF, as was the difference in sound pressure level near the tympanic membrane relative to the probe tip. Group responses in area function, total ear-canal length, absorbance and group delay, and admittance magnitude and phase were analyzed based on sex, ear, and age. Responses were compared between children/adults and younger/older adults relative to age 50 years. Ear and sex were never significant. Significant differences were observed in children compared to adults in the area function, absorbance and group delay, and admittance magnitude and phase (0.25-4 kHz). Group delay differed between younger and older adults. A second experiment assessed level dependence of responses to better understand limitations in probe performance observed in the main experiment. These results show the utility of time-domain measurements of the area function and derived reflectance to understand sound-transmission differences across age at frequencies important to middle-ear function.

Indexed as

Ear CanalAcoustic Impedance TestsAcousticsAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPressureSoundTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID39431854
PMCPMC11495878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.