Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431735›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Clinical and laboratory predictors for bacteremia in critically ill calves.

Mathilde L Pas, Jade Bokma, Filip Boyen, Bart Pardon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mathilde L PasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3546-1328
Jade BokmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.
Filip BoyenDepartment of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.
Bart PardonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-8433

Funding

FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu RF 21/6351 RATIOSEP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a main contributor to calf mortality, but diagnosis is difficult.

objectivesDevelop and validate a predictive model for bacteremia in critically ill calves (CIC). ANIMALS: A total of 334 CIC, sampled for blood culture.

methodsCross-sectional study. Multivariable logistic regression and classification tree analysis on clinical, ultrasonographic, and laboratory variables were performed on a dataset including all animals. Model validation was done on 30% of the dataset. Similar statistics (except validation) were performed on a subset of the database (n = 143), in which presumed contaminants were excluded.

resultsThe best performing model to predict bacteremia, taking all detected bacteria into account, included tachypnea, tachycardia, acidemia, hypoglycemia, venous hypoxemia, and hypoproteinemia. Sensitivity and specificity of this model were 70.6% and 98.0%, respectively, but decreased to 61.5% and 91.7% during model validation. The best-performing model, excluding presumed contaminants, included abnormal temperature, heart rate, absence of enteritis, hypocalcemia, and hyperlactatemia as risk factors for bacteremia. Sensitivity and specificity of this model were 71.4% and 93.9%, respectively. Both classification trees performed less well in comparison to logistic regression. The classification tree excluding presumed contaminants, featured hypoglycemia, absence of diarrhea, and hyperlactatemia as risk factors for bacteremia. Sensitivity and specificity were 39.4% and 92.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Hypoglycemia, hyperlactatemia, and hypoproteinemia seem relevant in assessing bacteremia in CIC. The performance of these models based on basic clinical and blood variables remains insufficient to predict bacteremia.

Indexed as

BacteremiaCattle DiseasesCritical IllnessAnimalsCattleCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHypoglycemiaLogistic ModelsMaleRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityTachypneaantimicrobial stewardshipbiomarkersblood cultureprediction modelsepsis

Identifiers

PMID39431735
PMCPMC11586552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.