Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431649›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Predicting Vaginal Delivery Success: Role of Intrapartum Transperineal Ultrasound Angle of Descent at a Single Center.

Peby Maulina Lestari, Dindadikusuma Dindadikusuma, Ratih Krisna, Theodorus Theodorus, Abarham Martadiansyah, Nuswil Bernolian, Putri Mirani, Muhammad Al Farisi Sutrisno, Bella Stevanny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peby Maulina LestariDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-0860-7830
Dindadikusuma DindadikusumaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.
Ratih KrisnaDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.
Theodorus TheodorusDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.
Abarham MartadiansyahDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-2978-5908
Nuswil BernolianDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-0074
Putri MiraniDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2969-9738
Muhammad Al Farisi SutrisnoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0001-3982-6032
Bella StevannyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital/Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5135-3012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Assessment of labor progress via digital vaginal examination is subjective, while intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography is deemed more objective and effective. The angle of descent (AoD) is a reliable intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameter with minimal inter-observer and intra-observer errors. This study compared intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography with digital vaginal examination in evaluating the angle of descent for vaginal delivery selection in 70 women. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang in Indonesia, using a consecutive sampling method to measure AoD of 70 patients at admission and every 2 h during labor progression. Patients were monitored until childbirth, and outcomes of successful vaginal or cesarean delivery were reported. A diagnostic test determined the optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery and its predictive value. RESULTS The study included 70 patients with a mean age of 28.29±6.09 years and a body mass index of 30.59±3.49 kg/m². Among them, 29 (41%) had successful vaginal deliveries. Adequate contraction frequency at admission was strongly associated with successful vaginal delivery (P<0.001). The optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery was 94.5°, with an area under the curve of 0.567 (95% CI 0.425-0.710), sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 45.7%, and accuracy of 54.3%. CONCLUSIONS Intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography for measuring AoD can be a valuable adjunct in labor management. Further investigations are needed to validate the optimal AoD in Indonesian pregnant women.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricLabor, ObstetricUltrasonographyAdultCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndonesiaParturitionPerineumPregnancyUltrasonography, PrenatalVaginaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39431649
PMCPMC11476033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.