Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431498›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2024

Prospective Connectomic-Based Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease.

Kevin Hines, Angela M Noecker, Anneke M Frankemolle-Gilbert, Tsao-Wei Liang, Jeffrey Ratliff, Melissa Heiry, Cameron C McIntyre, Chengyuan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Localizing beta synchronous neurons in the STN using directional DBS recordings and patient-specific biophysical models.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin HinesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-174X
Angela M NoeckerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Anneke M Frankemolle-GilbertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Tsao-Wei LiangDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffrey RatliffDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1264-1070
Melissa HeiryDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cameron C McIntyreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0932-854X
Chengyuan WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3954-2929

Funding

Application of Advanced Imaging and Visualization to Clinical Deep Brain StimulationR37NS116079 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCINTYRE, CAMERON · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIH HHS R37 NS116079NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS116079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on accurate lead placement as well as optimization of the stimulation parameters. Although clinical software tools are now available, programming still largely relies on a monopolar review, a tedious process for both patients and programmers.

objectiveThis study investigates the safety and feasibility of prospective automated connectomic DBS programming (automated connectomic programming [ACP]), focusing on the recruitment of specific white matter pathways.

methodsAfter DBS implantation, a detailed connectomic DBS model in patient-specific space was developed for each study participant. A driving-force model was used to quantify pathway recruitment across 2400 different DBS settings. Optimization algorithms maximized recruitment of therapeutic pathways while minimizing recruitment of side-effect pathways. Thirteen subjects were enrolled in two study phases that compared DBS settings derived from ACP to standard clinical DBS settings.

resultsNine patients underwent reprogramming with ACP (5 globus pallidus interna [GPi], 4 subthalamic nucleus [STN]). Four patients underwent initial programming with ACP (3 GPi, 1 STN). All patients tolerated ACP without persistent side effects. In the reprogramming cohort, 3 patients preferred their ACP program, and 1 patient felt it was comparable to their clinical program. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III, scores for the initial ACP cohort (3 GPi, 1 STN) improved by an average of 43.5% (40.4-52.6 ± 5.6%).

conclusionsACP appeared clinically safe and feasible. It provided reasonable motor improvement, which can be further optimized with subsequent clinical adjustment. Additional investigation is required to refine the optimization algorithm and to quantify the clinical benefit of ACP in a larger cohort. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationParkinson DiseaseSubthalamic NucleusAgedConnectomeFemaleGlobus PallidusHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomeautomated programmingconnectomedeep brain stimulationnetworkParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID39431498
PMCPMC11659031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.