ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2024
Prospective Connectomic-Based Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suppression of pathological oscillations with transcranial focused ultrasound in Parkinson's disease.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Continuous infusion therapy after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: indications, outcomes, and patient selection.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Remote programming versus standard in-person programming following deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Multimodal Image Guidance in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Localizing beta synchronous neurons in the STN using directional DBS recordings and patient-specific biophysical models.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- The optimization of neuroprosthetic interfaces relying on biophysical and surrogate digital twins.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Oscillatory dynamics in isolated dystonia: five hundred hours of chronic invasive multisite motor network recordings.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of structural connectomes for modeling deep brain stimulation pathway activation.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Are we ready for automated deep brain stimulation programming?Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Review
- Patient-specific and interpretable deep brain stimulation optimisation using MRI and clinical review data.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- A nonlinear relationship of evoked responses following charge-balanced single-pulse electrical stimulation with varying pulse widths.Brain stimulationArticle
- Comprehensive map of axonal pathway activation as a function of subthalamic deep brain stimulation location and parameter settings.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on accurate lead placement as well as optimization of the stimulation parameters. Although clinical software tools are now available, programming still largely relies on a monopolar review, a tedious process for both patients and programmers.
objectiveThis study investigates the safety and feasibility of prospective automated connectomic DBS programming (automated connectomic programming [ACP]), focusing on the recruitment of specific white matter pathways.
methodsAfter DBS implantation, a detailed connectomic DBS model in patient-specific space was developed for each study participant. A driving-force model was used to quantify pathway recruitment across 2400 different DBS settings. Optimization algorithms maximized recruitment of therapeutic pathways while minimizing recruitment of side-effect pathways. Thirteen subjects were enrolled in two study phases that compared DBS settings derived from ACP to standard clinical DBS settings.
resultsNine patients underwent reprogramming with ACP (5 globus pallidus interna [GPi], 4 subthalamic nucleus [STN]). Four patients underwent initial programming with ACP (3 GPi, 1 STN). All patients tolerated ACP without persistent side effects. In the reprogramming cohort, 3 patients preferred their ACP program, and 1 patient felt it was comparable to their clinical program. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III, scores for the initial ACP cohort (3 GPi, 1 STN) improved by an average of 43.5% (40.4-52.6 ± 5.6%).
conclusionsACP appeared clinically safe and feasible. It provided reasonable motor improvement, which can be further optimized with subsequent clinical adjustment. Additional investigation is required to refine the optimization algorithm and to quantify the clinical benefit of ACP in a larger cohort. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.