ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025
Validation of a software-based torsional measurement method of the lower limb: A retrospective study.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment and management of torsional malalignment in paediatric patients with patellofemoral joint instability.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Validation of a software-based torsional measurement method of the lower limb: A retrospective study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Radiological assessment of lower limb torsional deformities: a narrative review.Annals of joint · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate a software-based measurement tool of computed tomography imaging to assess torsional alignment of the lower limb-usually used for patients with posttraumatic deformities and patellofemoral issues-and compare these measurements with manual measurements of two experienced raters.
methodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of 58 lower limbs (47 patients, 20 men and 27 women) aged between 19 and 97 years. Inclusion criteria were the clinical indication for torsion measurement of the lower limb. Legs with incomplete imaging and age less than 18 years were excluded. Femoral and tibial torsion were measured separately. Torsional alignment was assessed software-based at two time points by two raters. Rater one additionally assessed manual-based measurement at two time points. The software used was mediCAD 3D Knee Version 2.5.33 (Hectec). Subsequently, intra- and inter-rater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Validity testing was performed by means of precision, concordance correlation coefficient according to Lin (ccc) and Pearson correlation coefficient.
resultsHigh intra-rater reliability for software-based as well as manual-based evaluation of torsional alignment was found for the tibia as well as the femur (ICC ranging between 0.870 and 0.993). Inter-rater reliability also showed highly significant results of both manual and software-based measurements (ICC ranging between 0.851 and 0.993). For almost all comparisons (except the tibia left), software-based measurements showed higher ICC scores above 0.9, and, therefore, classified as 'excellent reliability'. For validity testing, correlation coefficients and precision showed very good correspondence of the measurements (all values > 0.9), without systematic deviations.
conclusionsSoftware-based measurement of torsional alignment according to the measurement method developed by H.-A. Waidelich proved to be a reliable and valid technique. Especially for inexperienced surgeons, software-based measurement, therefore, might improve confidence in reliable medical decisions in diagnostics and treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.