Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431411›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

LukProt: A Database of Eukaryotic Predicted Proteins Designed for Investigations of Animal Origins.

Łukasz F Sobala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Łukasz F SobalaLaboratory of Glycobiology, Department of Immunochemistry, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, PAS, Weigla 12, 53-114 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3807-6452

Funding

National Science Centre of Poland 2020/36/C/NZ8/00081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origins and early evolution of animals are subjects with many outstanding questions. One problem faced by researchers trying to answer them is the absence of a comprehensive database with sequences from nonbilaterians. Publicly available data are plentiful but scattered and often not associated with proper metadata. A new database presented in this paper, LukProt, is an attempt at solving this issue. The database contains protein sequences obtained mostly from genomic, transcriptomic, and metagenomic studies and is an extension of EukProt (Richter DJ, Berney C, Strassert JFH, Poh Y-P, Herman EK, Muñoz-Gómez SA, Wideman JG, Burki F, de Vargas C. EukProt: a database of genome-scale predicted proteins across the diversity of eukaryotes. Peer Community J. 2022:2:e56. https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.173). LukProt adopts the EukProt naming conventions and includes data from 216 additional animals. The database is associated with a taxonomic grouping (taxogroup) scheme suitable for studying early animal evolution. Minor updates to the database will contain species additions or metadata corrections, whereas major updates will synchronize LukProt to each new version of EukProt, and releases are permanently stored on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7089120). A BLAST server to search the database is available at: https://lukprot.hirszfeld.pl/. Users are invited to participate in maintaining and correcting LukProt. As it can be searched without downloading locally, the database aims to be a convenient resource not only for evolutionary biologists, but for the broader scientific community as well.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinEukaryotaAnimalsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularProteinsProteinseukaryoteevolutionmetazoaproteome

Identifiers

PMID39431411
PMCPMC11534060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.