Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431403›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2025

Using Implementation Science to Implement Evidence-Based Practice: A Discursive Paper.

Audrey Chays-Amania, Jocelyn Schwingrouber, Sébastien Colson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Audrey Chays-AmaniaAix-Marseille Université, Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Nursing School, CEReSS, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4048-4727
Jocelyn SchwingrouberAix-Marseille Université, Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Nursing School, CEReSS, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-7077
Sébastien ColsonAix-Marseille Université, Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Nursing School, CEReSS, APHM, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3104-7883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe purpose of this manuscript is to offer an overview of knowledge regarding Evidence-Based Practice and implementation science. It addresses the question: What are the EBP implementation models used in nursing settings?

designDiscursive paper.

methodsThe databases were searched with the following keywords: 'Nursing Faculty', 'Nurse educator', 'Academic', 'clinic', 'Evidence-based implementation', 'evidence-based practice', 'implementation', 'implementation science', 'undergraduate', 'nurse'. The search strategy aims to identify published studies. Eight databases were searched.

resultsThere are specific implementation models for implementing EBP: the IOWA Model, the Stetler Model, the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model, the Stevens Star Model, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS), the Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close collaboration (ARCC) model. They were analysed according to the Nilsen classification. An evidence-based implementation project must be structured. First, it is necessary to choose an implementation model, then identify one or more implementation strategies, and finally, plan evaluation for implementation outcome. The use of implementation science ensures successful implementation or at least highlights barriers that need adjustment. Effective utilisation of implementation science facilitates the transfer of obtained results to similar contexts.

conclusionImplementation science complements the EBP process perfectly and ensures the proper implementation of evidence. IMPLICATION FOR THE PROFESSION: EBP mentors now have the entire structure of implementation science to succeed in implementing evidence-based data in both academic and clinical settings. IMPACT: The discursive paper addresses the difficulties of implementing evidence in academic or clinical settings. Implementation science is the bridge between evidence and practice. Nurses now have everything they need to implement evidence-based practice successfully. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was no patient or public involvement in the design or writing of this discursive article.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based NursingEvidence-Based PracticeImplementation ScienceHumansModels, NursingEBP mentorsevidence‐based practiceimplementation modelsimplementation outcomesimplementation scienceimplementation strategiesnurses

Identifiers

PMID39431403
PMCPMC12535329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.