Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431364›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2025

Oral, Vaginal, and Stool Microbial Signatures in Patients With Endometriosis as Potential Diagnostic Non-Invasive Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Chloe Hicks, Mathew Leonardi, Xin-Yi Chua, Lisa Mari-Breedt, Mercedes Espada, Emad M El-Omar, George Condous, Fatima El-Assaad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Impact of gut microbiota on endometriosis: linking physical injury to mental health.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chloe HicksMicrobiome Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, St George & Sutherland Clinical Campuses, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0422-432X
Mathew LeonardiEndometriosis Ultrasound and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5538-6906
Xin-Yi ChuaMicrobiome Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, St George & Sutherland Clinical Campuses, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lisa Mari-BreedtMicrobiome Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, St George & Sutherland Clinical Campuses, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mercedes EspadaEndometriosis Ultrasound and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emad M El-OmarMicrobiome Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, St George & Sutherland Clinical Campuses, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
George CondousEndometriosis Ultrasound and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Fatima El-AssaadMicrobiome Research Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, St George & Sutherland Clinical Campuses, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Australian GovernmentUniversity of New South Wales
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify a microbial signature for endometriosis for use as a diagnostic non-invasive biomarker.

designProspective cohort pilot study.

settingNepean Hospital and UNSW Microbiome Research Centre, Australia. POPULATION: Sixty-four age- and sex-matched subjects (n = 19 healthy control (HC); n = 24 non-endometriosis (N-ENDO) and n = 21 confirmed endometriosis (ENDO)). All study participants, besides healthy controls, underwent laparoscopic surgical assessment for endometriosis, and histology was performed on excised lesions.

methodsOral, stool and, vaginal samples were self-collected at a single time point for healthy controls, and preoperatively for patients undergoing laparoscopy. Samples underwent 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, followed by bioinformatics analysis.

main outcome measuresCompositional differences between cohorts as identified by diversity analyses, and differentially abundant microbial taxa, as identified by LEfSE analysis.

resultsThe composition of the oral (adjusted p = 0.003), and stool (adjusted p = 0.042) microbiota is different between the three cohorts. Differentially abundant taxa are present within each cohort as identified by LEfSE analysis. Particularly, Fusobacterium was enriched in the oral samples of patients with moderate/severe endometriosis.

conclusionsTaxonomic and compositional differences were found between the microbiota in the mouth, gut and, vagina of patients with and without endometriosis and healthy controls. Fusobacterium was enriched in patients with moderate/severe endometriosis. Fusobacterium is noted as a key pathogen in periodontal disease, a common comorbidity in endometriosis. These findings suggest a role for the oral, stool and, vaginal microbiome in endometriosis, and present potential for microbial-based treatments and the design of a diagnostic swab.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEndometriosisFecesMicrobiotaMouthVaginaAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBiomarkersRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacteriabiomarkerdiagnosticdysbiosisendometriosisinflammationmicrobiomemicrobiotaoral

Identifiers

PMID39431364
PMCPMC11704027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.