ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024
A general approach to improve adversarial robustness of DNNs for medical image segmentation and detection.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- OMGMed: Advanced System for Ocular Myasthenia Gravis Diagnosis via Eye Image Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is known that deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial noises. Improving adversarial robustness of DNNs is essential. This is not only because unperceivable adversarial noise is a threat to the performance of DNNs models, but also adversarially robust DNNs have a strong resistance to the white noises that may present everywhere in the actual world. To improve adversarial robustness of DNNs, a variety of adversarial training methods have been proposed. Most of the previous methods are designed under one single application scenario: image classification. However, image segmentation, landmark detection, and object detection are more commonly observed than classifying the entire images in the medical imaging field. Although classification tasks and other tasks (e.g., regression) share some similarities, they also differ in certain ways, e.g., some adversarial training methods use misclassification criteria, which is well-defined in classification but not in regression. These restrictions/limitations hinder application of adversarial training for many medical imaging analysis tasks. In our work, the contributions are as follows: (1) We investigated the existing adversarial training methods and discovered the challenges that make those methods unsuitable for adaptation in segmentation and detection tasks. (2) We modified and adapted some existing adversarial training methods for medical image segmentation and detection tasks. (3) We proposed a general adversarial training method for medical image segmentation and detection. (4) We implemented our method in diverse medical imaging tasks using publicly available datasets, including MRI segmentation, Cephalometric landmark detection, and blood cell detection. The experiments substantiated the effectiveness of our method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.