ArticleJuntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal2024
Effects of Different Intensities of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Spinal Reciprocal Inhibition in Healthy Persons.
Article in Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effect of the spinal circuit of repetitive magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on the soleus muscle among healthy subjects. Methods: Nineteen healthy adults were included in this study. Intermittent rPMS was applied to the left soleus muscle for 20 minutes. We applied different intensity rPMS (high-intensity, low-intensity, and non-stimulation) in different three days. RI (reciprocal inhibition) from the tibialis anterior to the soleus muscle with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 2ms and 20ms was assessed before, immediately after and 30 minutes at each session. Results: Two factor repeated measure ANOVA test showed a significant interaction (F Conclusion: This study demonstrates that high-intensity rPMS can effectively modulate spinal circuits, as evidenced by the decreased RI in healthy individuals. This suggests the potential use of rPMS as a therapeutic intervention for patients with muscle weakness. Disinhibition of the RI may lead to a more effective contraction of the target muscle. This effect could be expected to strengthen the muscles and alleviate paralysis, making it a promising avenue for future research and clinical applications in the field of rehabilitation. Further investigation is warranted to explore the precise mechanisms underlying the observed effects and to optimize the parameters of rPMS for specific clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.