ArticleGlobal heart2024
Rationale and Design of a Multi-National Study of Physicians' Opinions, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Influenza Vaccination in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Mixed Methods Designs. The FLUence Project.
Article in Global heart, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infections, particularly those involving the respiratory tract, are associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events, both de novo and as exacerbations of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. Influenza vaccination has consistently been shown to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. Nonetheless, vaccination rates among adults remain suboptimal, both in the general population and among high-risk individuals. Multiple barriers hinder achieving adequate vaccination rates, with physicians' beliefs and attitudes towards these interventions being crucial. The FLUence project was developed within the framework of the World Heart Federation's Emerging Leaders program, to address this issue. This project has two phases: a global quantitative survey to assess the perceptions, opinions, and attitudes and challenges of physicians worldwide regarding the safety and efficacy of the influenza vaccination use, and a qualitative survey to further investigate the barriers and facilitators of recommending and using this vaccination. The quantitative survey was created and disseminated in five languages (English, Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese) to physicians of all specialties who care for adults, with a particular focus on patients with cardiovascular disease. The survey included eight domains with a total of 36 questions with closed options; a Likert scale with five possible answers was used to gauge participants' opinions. To gain deeper insights into the complexities behind the low vaccination rates in adults, the second part of the project comprises a qualitative survey, conducted in the two lower-middle- and upper-middle-income countries: India and Argentina, respectively. These countries were selected because patients with cardiovascular diseases have access to free influenza vaccination in Argentina, whereas patients must pay for the vaccine out of pocket in India. Thus, the FLUence study will provide valuable information to better understand the perceptions and barriers to improving influenza vaccination rates from the perspective of physicians. It is imperative to actively engage all healthcare providers to improve influenza vaccination rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.