ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Ivermectin-Based Mass Drug Administration for Scabies in Northern India: A Single-Arm Community Intervention Trial.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scabies and impetigo cause direct health effects and contribute to severe infectious and immune-mediated complications. Ivermectin-based mass drug administration can reduce scabies and impetigo prevalence in island settings with high prevalence, but the effectiveness in moderate-prevalence settings is not known. Methods: We conducted a single-arm, before-after community intervention trial. Mass drug administration was offered to the entire population of 4 villages in Uttarakhand, India. The treatment consisted of 2 doses, given 7 days apart, of oral ivermectin (∼200 μg/kg), or topical 5% permethrin if ivermectin was contraindicated. The primary outcome was the prevalence of scabies at 12 months compared with baseline, as diagnosed using clinical assessment and the 2020 International Alliance for the Control of Scabies criteria. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of impetigo at each time point. The trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001712190). Results: In January 2020, 1211 participants were enrolled (100% of the estimated village population). Treatment coverage was high-1204 (99.4%) and 1177 (97.2%) received 1 and 2 doses, respectively. Scabies was diagnosed in 91 participants (7.5%) and impetigo in 15 (1.2%). In February 2021, 1190 (98.3% of baseline) participants re-enrolled, and of these 11 had scabies (0.9%; relative risk reduction, 87.7%; 95% CI, 77.1%-93.4%) and 5 had impetigo (0.4%; relative risk reduction, 66.1%; 95% CI, 7.0%-87.6%). Conclusions: A single round of ivermectin-based mass drug administration substantially reduced the prevalence of scabies and impetigo in this setting with moderate scabies prevalence in northern India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.