Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431127›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2024

Ferroelectric materials for neuroinspired computing applications.

Dong Wang, Shenglan Hao, Brahim Dkhil, Bobo Tian, Chungang Duan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Thickness Engineering in HfONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Crystallized Domain Walls in HfOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuromorphic Devices and Computing for Sensing, Memory, and Control.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. In-memory ferroelectric differentiator.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dong WangKey Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices (MOE), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Center of Brain-inspired Intelligent Materials and Devices, Department of Electronics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
Shenglan HaoKey Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices (MOE), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Center of Brain-inspired Intelligent Materials and Devices, Department of Electronics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
Brahim DkhilLaboratoire Structures, Propriétés et Modélisation des Solides, CentraleSupélec, CNRS-UMR8580, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris 91190, France.
Bobo TianKey Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices (MOE), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Center of Brain-inspired Intelligent Materials and Devices, Department of Electronics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
Chungang DuanKey Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices (MOE), Ministry of Education, Shanghai Center of Brain-inspired Intelligent Materials and Devices, Department of Electronics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the emergence of numerous applications of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked a new technological revolution. These applications include facial recognition, autonomous driving, intelligent robotics, and image restoration. However, the data processing and storage procedures in the conventional von Neumann architecture are discrete, which leads to the "memory wall" problem. As a result, such architecture is incompatible with AI requirements for efficient and sustainable processing. Exploring new computing architectures and material bases is therefore imperative. Inspired by neurobiological systems, in-memory and in-sensor computing techniques provide a new means of overcoming the limitations inherent in the von Neumann architecture. The basis of neural morphological computation is a crossbar array of high-density, high-efficiency non-volatile memory devices. Among the numerous candidate memory devices, ferroelectric memory devices with non-volatile polarization states, low power consumption and strong endurance are expected to be ideal candidates for neuromorphic computing. Further research on the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) compatibility for these devices is underway and has yielded favorable results. Herein, we first introduce the development of ferroelectric materials as well as their mechanisms of polarization reversal and detail the applications of ferroelectric synaptic devices in artificial neural networks. Subsequently, we introduce the latest developments in ferroelectrics-based in-memory and in-sensor computing. Finally, we review recent works on hafnium-based ferroelectric memory devices with CMOS process compatibility and give a perspective for future developments.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkFerroelectric materialsFerroelectric synaptic devicesIn-memory computingIn-sensor computing

Identifiers

PMID39431127
PMCPMC11489484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.