ArticleHuman factors in healthcare2024
Stepping into the Virtual Realm: Examining the Utility of Non-Immersive VR on Medical Residents' Self-Efficacy, Performance, and Satisfaction.
Article in Human factors in healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central Venous Catheterization (CVC) is conducted in more than 5 million patients annually in the United States. Currently, CVC theoretical knowledge is typically taught with didactic lectures with minimal assessment of knowledge before simulation training and clinical environment. To assess CVC theoretical knowledge, virtual reality (VR) can develop residents' surgical skills and can provide feedback on performance. While all types of VR can be used to assess improvements in residents' knowledge prior to simulation training, few studies have compared the impact of non-immersive VR on improving resident knowledge. The current study was developed to identify the utility of a non-immersive CathSim VR on improvements in resident CVC theoretical knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction when compared to a traditional multiple-choice assessment This was completed through an empirical investigation with 34 medical residents. The results showed that when compared to a traditional multiple-choice assessment, the non-immersive CathSim VR assessment led to improvements in self-efficacy and potentially better learning experience. Meanwhile, results also showed that there were no differences in assessment score, number of attempts, and overall satisfaction. Thus, we can conclude that non-immersive VR has the potential to be more effective than traditional multiple-choice test in improving self-efficacy and is as effective for residents' assessment score, number of attempts, and overall satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.