ArticleACS omega2024
Exploring
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lactoferrin, an iron binding glycoprotein-based nanoparticle, has emerged as a promising platform for drug delivery and imaging. This study presents the potential use of the protein nanocarrier in tracking sentinel lymph nodes for cancer staging. Lactoferrin nanoparticles (LF-NPs) were synthesized using a thermal treatment process and optimized to obtain 60-70 nm particle size with PDI less than 0.2. The NPs were characterized microscopically and spectroscopically, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of their physicochemical properties. The LF-NPs were found to be stable in different pH conditions. Their biocompatibility was confirmed through cytotoxicity assessments on RAW 264.7 cells, and hemolysis assay and in vivo toxicity study reveal their safe profile. Additionally, LF-NPs were successfully radiolabeled with technetium-99m (>90% labeling yield). Cell uptake studies with RAW 264.7 exhibited an uptake of ∼6%. Biodistribution studies in Wistar rats shed light on their in vivo behavior and suitability for targeted drug delivery systems. These findings collectively emphasize the multifaceted utility of LF-NPs, positioning them as a promising platform for diverse biomedical innovations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.