ArticleACS omega2024
Study on the Microflow Field Output Performance: Effects of Rib/Channel Dimensions and Sensitivity to Operating Conditions.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rib/channel dimensions significantly affect mass transfer, product water discharge, and electron transport. Aiming for high-power density stacks, bipolar plate thickness has been continually reduced, and microflow fields with the width and height smaller than 1 mm currently lack thorough experimental study. In this article, three stainless-steel plates were designed and fabricated, featuring rib/channel widths of 0.2:0.8 mm (SS-0.2/0.8), 0.3:0.7 mm (SS-0.3/0.7), and 0.5:0.5 mm (SS-0.5/0.5). SS-0.5/0.5 gained a 59.05% peak power density enhancement over a graphite plate G1.0/1.0 with rib/channel widths of 1.0:1.0 mm. Furthermore, sensitivities of microflow fields to cathode inlet humidity (RHc), anode/cathode inlet pressures (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.