ArticleACS omega2024
Heavy Metal Rejection Performance and Mechanical Performance of Cellulose-Nanofibril-Reinforced Cellulose Acetate Membranes.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of Cadmium Adsorption onto a Cellulose Acetate-Clay Composite Membrane Using Box-Behnken Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fabrication of Cellulose Acetate-Based Membrane Doped with Plasticizer for High-Efficiency Separation of COPolymers · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this research, cellulose acetate (CA) and CA nanocomposite membranes, reinforced with mass fractions of cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), are prepared using the phase separation technique. The membranes are extensively characterized using several techniques: Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirms the chemical structures, while Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) reveals their surface morphology. Mechanical characterization is conducted to explore the mechanical behavior of the membranes under wet and dry conditions through tensile testing. The mechanical properties of CA and CA-CNF membranes are also estimated using the Mori-Tanaka mean-field homogenization method and compared to experimental findings. The flux performance for pure and dam water, assessed at 3 bar, demonstrates that CNF reinforcement notably enhances the CA membrane's performance, particularly in flux rate and fouling resistance. The CA membrane shows high efficiency in removing Fe
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.