ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2024
Enhanced Extraction of Activation Time and Contractility From Myocardial Strain Data Using Parameter Space Features and Computational Simulations.
Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A computational model enables the extraction of two critical myocardial tissue properties: activation time (AT) and contractility (Con) from recorded cardiac strains. However, interference between these parameters reduces the precision and accuracy of the extraction process. This study investigates whether leveraging features in the parameter space can enhance parameter extraction. We utilized a computational model to simulate sarcomere mechanics, creating a parameter space grid of 41 × 41 AT and Con pairs. Each pair generated a simulated strain pattern, and by scanning the grid, we identified cohorts of similar strain patterns for each simulation. These cohorts were represented as binary images-synthetic fingerprints-where the position and shape of each blob indicated extraction uniqueness. We also generated a measurement fingerprint for a strain pattern from a patient with left bundle branch block and compared it to the synthetic fingerprints to calculate a proximity map based on their similarity. This approach allowed us to extract AT and Con using both the measurement fingerprint and the proximity map, corresponding to simple optimization and enhanced parameter extraction methods, respectively. Each synthetic fingerprint consisted of a single connected blob whose size and shape varied characteristically within the parameter space. The AT values extracted from the measurement fingerprint and the proximity map ranged from -59 to 19 ms and from -16 to 14 ms, respectively, while Con values ranged from 48% to 110% and from 85% to 110%, respectively. This study demonstrates that similarity in simulations leads to an asymmetric distribution of parameter values in the parameter space. By using a proximity map, this distortion is considered, significantly improving the accuracy of parameter extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.