Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39431041›Full record

ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2024

Male breast cancer in a single-center experience: Diagnosis, clinicopathological features, and treatment strategies.

Deniz Isik, Oguzcan Kinikoglu, Ezgi Turkoglu, Heves Surmeli, Neslihan Buyukmurat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deniz IsikDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Oguzcan KinikogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Ezgi TurkogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Heves SurmeliDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Neslihan BuyukmuratDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women worldwide, it is a rare tumor in men, accounting for less than 1% of all male cancers. Therefore, the characteristics of the tumor, the management of the disease, and our overall survival data are quite limited.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 51 male patients diagnosed and treated for breast cancer, whose follow-up processes continue, at our hospital. We examined in detail the patients' age, comorbid diseases, history of concomitant malignancies, family history, stage of the disease, tumor size, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) along with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER-2) status. Additionally, we analyzed the type of surgery, history of radiotherapy, and chemotherapy and hormonal treatments in the adjuvant and metastatic periods.

resultsIn our study, where we determined a median survival time of 122 months (29-214), we found that the stage at diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy significantly affected survival. While the median survival was not reached in stage 1 patients at diagnosis, the median survival times for stage 2, 3, and 4 patients were 118, 83, and 39 months, respectively. The differences between the groups were statistically significant (p=0.005). Similarly, the median survival was not reached for patients with an ECOG performance status of 0, but it was 84 months for those with a status of 1 and 98 months for those with a status of 2. The differences among these three groups were also statistically significant (p=0.001). The median survival was not reached for patients who completed adjuvant endocrine therapy, whereas it was 83 months for those who discontinued the therapy, with the difference being statistically significant (p=0.021). Besides these data, the presence of perineural invasion was found to be a factor close to statistical significance in terms of survival (p=0.066). Histological subgroups, grade, lymphovascular invasion, adjuvant chemotherapy, and Ki-67 were not significant parameters for survival.

conclusionDespite the differences in the stage at diagnosis, response to treatments, lower awareness of the disease, older age at diagnosis, and consequently, the increase in accompanying comorbid diseases, male breast cancer is managed according to studies and guideline recommendations for female breast cancer due to the lack of sufficient randomized studies. By presenting our clinical experience, we have emphasized the necessity for further studies in this field.

Indexed as

Breast cancer survivalmale breast cancerraretreatment

Identifiers

PMID39431041
PMCPMC11487305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.